Re: [DNSOP] AS112 document question

2014-05-24 Thread S Moonesamy
Hi Joe, At 08:33 22-05-2014, Joe Abley wrote: We have two documents proceeding (in wglc) together, both relating to AS112 service: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-dname The 6304bis document updates the advice to people running AS112 nodes to incorporate the new scheme d

Re: [DNSOP] AS112 document question

2014-05-22 Thread Joe Abley
On 22 May 2014, at 12:19, Chris Thompson wrote: > On May 22 2014, Joe Abley wrote: > > [...] >> William has reminded me that there has been some work done amongst current >> AS112 operators to add an IPv6 prefix to the current scheme, and that some >> AS112 operators have deployed it. > > But

Re: [DNSOP] AS112 document question

2014-05-22 Thread Chris Thompson
On May 22 2014, Joe Abley wrote: [...] William has reminded me that there has been some work done amongst current AS112 operators to add an IPv6 prefix to the current scheme, and that some AS112 operators have deployed it. But does this get exercised at all, as long as blackhole-1.iana.org and

[DNSOP] AS112 document question

2014-05-22 Thread Joe Abley
Hi all, We have two documents proceeding (in wglc) together, both relating to AS112 service: draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc6304bis draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-dname The 6304bis document updates the advice to people running AS112 nodes to incorporate the new scheme described in the as112-dname document, w