On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Alfred HÎnes wrote:
At Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:27:20 -0500 (EST), William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
Given that the other two drafts on AS112 are already along the path
to getting considered beyond the WGLC, would it be prudent to
generate a third draft specific to these issues?
At Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:27:20 -0500 (EST), William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
> ...
>
> Given that the other two drafts on AS112 are already along the path
> to getting considered beyond the WGLC, would it be prudent to
> generate a third draft specific to these issues?
Nicely said.
This indeed aga
Greetings all,
There's some light discussion on the as112-ops mailing list about
whether or not AS112 should start doing a further two things:
- start replying using IPv6 transport
- amass more delegations for network blocks, like those enumerated in
rfc5735.
Given that the other two draf
