On 4/9/19 6:44 PM, Richard Gibson wrote:
> If an implementation has a resolver, then that component is the
> logical place for deduplication (e.g., the second inbound query for a
> given ANAME target does not result in a second outbound query, but
> rather waits on completion of the first).
Oh, r
Vladimír Čunát wrote:
>
> I can't even see a simple way of detecting this. At least in the
> implementation suggested by Jan where you have an authoritative that
> calls out to a resolver (which calls out to authoritatives...)
You could prevent the loop from leading to a circular dependency, rat
If an implementation has a resolver, then that component is the logical
place for deduplication (e.g., the second inbound query for a given
ANAME target does not result in a second outbound query, but rather
waits on completion of the first).
On 4/9/19 11:15, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
On 4/9/19 3
On 4/9/19 3:38 PM, Richard Gibson wrote:
> This loop is one reason of several to eliminate inline resolution for
> ANAME if possible and minimize it otherwise, but is not quite as bad
> as it seems because all involved servers can—and should—avoid issuing
> queries that are redundant with an alread
This loop is one reason of several to eliminate inline resolution for
ANAME if possible and minimize it otherwise, but is not quite as bad as
it seems because all involved servers can—and should—avoid issuing
queries that are redundant with an already-active request. But even if
they don't, the
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 5:54 PM Tony Finch wrote:
> WRT loop detection, it is much easier if the additional section in the
> response from the resolver contains the chain(s). The draft doesn't
> specify that at the moment; maybe it should.
I meant a situation where an authoritative server is doing
One thing I have been pondering is multi-target aliases. (But I haven't
posted about it here because I don't think the suggestion will get very
far!) Multi-aliases would be useful in some situations when I would like
to be able to model systems at a higher level, for things like
mx.cam.ac.uk which
On 4/2/19 7:31 PM, Olli Vanhoja wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:03 PM Tony Finch wrote:
>> WRT loop detection, it is much easier if the additional section in the
>> response from the resolver contains the chain(s). The draft doesn't
>> specify that at the moment; maybe it should.
> Why is it eas
Olli Vanhoja wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:03 PM Tony Finch wrote:
> >
> > WRT loop detection, it is much easier if the additional section in the
> > response from the resolver contains the chain(s). The draft doesn't
> > specify that at the moment; maybe it should.
>
> Why is it easier?
May
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:03 PM Tony Finch wrote:
>
> WRT loop detection, it is much easier if the additional section in the
> response from the resolver contains the chain(s). The draft doesn't
> specify that at the moment; maybe it should.
Why is it easier? I would think some people may even wan
Jan Včelák submitted a GitHub issue about loop detection which I think
should be discussed by the wg not just the authors.
https://github.com/each/draft-aname/issues/45
The -02 draft requires that CNAME+ANAME chains are chased to their
ultimate target. There are a few reasons for this:
* It is mo
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 9:58 PM Tony Finch wrote:
> There were several useful points at the mic; thanks Paul Hoffman for
> noting them in the minutes (especially because I could not remember who
> said what). In no particular order...
Tim also mentioned that the vendors have their own secret sauce
Tony,
Thanks for listing these points. I converted them to issues (together
with some other issues that people mentioned last week and on the list).
https://github.com/each/draft-aname/issues
I am more than happy to take on the editorial work.
Best regards,
Matthijs
On 3/29/19 9:58 PM,
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 9:59 PM Tony Finch wrote:
>
> Thanks to Matthijs Mekking for the good summary this morning. I am happy
> for someone else to take over editorial/authorship duties on the draft.
>
I would be more than happy to help with this draft and to get in
through the process.
___
(Starting a new thread so my mailer doesn't sort the new discussion with
messages from November!)
Thanks to Matthijs Mekking for the good summary this morning. I am happy
for someone else to take over editorial/authorship duties on the draft.
There were several useful points at the mic; thanks Pa
15 matches
Mail list logo
