From: Olafur Gudmundsson [mailto:o...@ogud.com]
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-woodworth-bulk-rr-00.txt
>
> On Nov 2, 2015, at 12:28 AM, Woodworth, John R
> wrote:
>
> See inline comments:
>
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Edwa
> On Nov 2, 2015, at 12:28 AM, Woodworth, John R
> wrote:
>
> See inline comments:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Edward Lewis [mailto:edward.le...@icann.org
>> <mailto:edward.le...@icann.org>]
>> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] discussion for
See inline comments:
> -Original Message-
> From: Edward Lewis [mailto:edward.le...@icann.org]
> Subject: Re: [DNSOP] discussion for draft-woodworth-bulk-rr-00.txt
>
> Process wise, you should seek to have this on the experimental track. It
> has potential but is far
Process wise, you should seek to have this on the experimental track. It
has potential but is far from a sure thing.
The idea of being able to send formulas for generating responses,
particularly for address records, reverse map and CNAME is a latent need
in the DNS hosting industry. These types
All,
Apologies for any procedural missteps as I am new to the group but am trainable.
I am looking to get some traction on a recent I-D my group is working on and
am looking for advice along the way.
We are confident this draft can play a significant role in the future of DNS
especially as it re
