In message <87639qrq25@mid.deneb.enyo.de>, Florian Weimer writes:
> * Alfred H=F6nes:
>
> > There must be a hidden trick to introduce DNS Jumbograms we just
> > forgot to mention
>
> The claims about firewall issues seems dubious to me. It's certainly
> not the 512 byte limit which is
* Alfred Hönes:
> There must be a hidden trick to introduce DNS Jumbograms we just
> forgot to mention
The claims about firewall issues seems dubious to me. It's certainly
not the 512 byte limit which is a problem here---I think we've got
pretty good empiric evidence that it's not a problem
Well - her name was attached to the article, so I didn't think
it was inappropriate to mention gender. And no, shes not the
first journalist to mangle words or misunderstand, or misrepresent.
--bill
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 08:56:07PM +0100, Alfred Hvnes wrote:
> Bill Manning wrote:
>
> >
Bill Manning wrote:
> cool eh? although I suspect she ment responses.
>
> --bill
Yet responses usually did not go *to* the root servers so far.
I'm getting confused.:-) :-)
Did anybody ever have a prejudice against journalists?
-- reconsider, please! :-)
Alfred.
P.S.: Disclosing
cool eh? although I suspect she ment responses.
--bill
On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 07:58:41PM +0100, Alfred Hvnes wrote:
> Interesting News!
>
> There must be a hidden trick to introduce DNS Jumbograms we just
> forgot to mention
>
>
> In a press article [1] entitled
> "Root z
