Patrik,
My personal view is that, if the same (or an extremely similar)
term is in use for the cases you enumerate, especially if most
of those who use it think they are saying something precise, we
are better off listing those cases and making the possible
confusion clear. In particular, saying
On 15 Aug 2018, at 22:01, John C Klensin wrote:
> In that regard, I find the document's definition of "split DNS"
> a little bit frustrating, as I have seen (multiple times) a
> distinction made between names (or a zone) that would clearly be part of the
> public DNS except that they are hidden f
