I like the ANAME idea and find it overall simple if what we are trying to
solve is CNAME at apex. If what is being solved is per service then it is
another story.
As much as I like it, I find the resolution at the auth nameserver a bad
thing for a couple of reasons.
As has been mentioned before:
1
I am going to echo my original comment on the draft as it may have been
lost in this long thread and it will make sense to keep this close to
related convo.
```
As for feedback on the draft options.
- Section 2.3: Why DoH has no option data? The IP from the DNS recursive
name server option merely
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 4:46 PM Ted Lemon wrote:
> A user who relies on the dhcp server for dns server info is no worse off.
> The problem is that if your host lets the dhcp server override the DoT or
> DoH configuration you entered manually, you are a lot worse off.
>
This seems to be a static
I am going to focus back on the draft itself. While the discussion around
centralizing DNS to 3rd party vs local ISP (or any other alternatives) is
worth having, it is a fact that most people get their DNS server set using
DHCP.
the current state is that all you will get are addresses that you can
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 9:32 AM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> We discussed this and there appears to be support to adopt this, with
> the caveat of adding more content to the section on Operational
> Considerations.
>
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-bortzmeyer-rfc7816bis
>
> The draft is
That's a great feedback Jonathan! Thanks
Manu
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:40 AM Jonathan Reed wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, manu tman wrote:
>
> > I'd like to see this standardized too.
> > Side note: I would also be interested to get a return of experienc
I'd like to see this standardized too.
Side note: I would also be interested to get a return of experience from
people operating qname minimization at scale, the type of issues
encountered, what are the ratios of such errors hint @marek :)
Manu
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 2:35 PM Paul Wouters w
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 7:49 PM Patrick McManus wrote:
>
> *We'll do the meeting over 1 hour in the Dorchester room from 16:30 to
> 17:30 on Monday July 16th.*
>
Will it be recorded and will there be everything set for remote
participants?
Manu
___
DNS
> the draft uses Vnew Vold Vleg and nonV without description.
> that makes it hard for me as I still do not fully understand the idea ...
Well it is defined/described in section 3 but I agree that a high level
explanation in the terminology section would not hurt.
Manu
___
