> On Jul 4, 2017, at 9:23 PM, Matthew Kerwin wrote:
>
> On 5 July 2017 at 13:19, Mark Andrews wrote:
>>
>> In message
>> ,
>> Matthew Kerwin writes:
>>> On 5 July 2017 at 10:02, Mark Andrews wrote:
Who owns a name is a different question to what machines serve the
tuple and
> On Aug 10, 2015, at 3:54 PM, Darcy Kevin (FCA)
> wrote:
>
> In retrospect, the definition of the “http” and “https” schemes (i.e. RFC
> 7230) should have probably enumerated clearly which name registries were
> acceptable for those schemes,
I generally try to avoid enumerating things that a
