Packet size is harder to analyze. ANY often pulls some records that
aren't used, and if the site isn't configured carefully then ANY can
even end up falling back to TCP, costing bytes _and_ packets. On the
other hand, there are a huge number of Internet sites that don't have a
noticeable volume of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Thompson wrote:
> but they don't define "regularly". If they had said "you must check
> at least once a week", and also made that policy known to their TLD
> clients, then we could castigate PR for the removing their old KSK
> too soon. As it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kim Davies wrote:
> I do not intend to speak for anyone at ISC, but I believe they stated on
> this list previously they sync with the ITAR data on a weekly basis.
I believe it may be time to switch to daily updates. It's a simple
https pull from a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Vixie wrote:
>> From: David Conrad
>> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:45:58 -0700
>>
>> Since time is quite short for folks to upgrade their servers and given
>> some root server operators are financially / operationally / politically
>> constrained in
