On 20 May 2014 04:54, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
>
> Ted Lemon wrote:
>
> On May 19, 2014, at 6:12 PM, David C Lawrence wrote:
>
> Not so much pushing required, at least of Akamai. You have a
> ready-made [SRV] ally in me, if only clients actually made good use of it.
> The clients are the real obstacl
On 3 April 2014 04:18, David Conrad wrote:
> Paul,
>
> On Apr 3, 2014, at 12:38 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
Saving space and time does matter. Roughly half the operators I studied
would include a backup key on-line because "they could" with the shorted
length. And performance does
On 1 October 2010 16:15, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Matt McCutchen
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 11:29 -0400, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>> > In particular I am very concerned about the particular approach being
>> > taken to security policy. What th
On 1 October 2010 08:29, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> The reason that I started with the requirement to use SSL is that security
> policy relating to trust criteria is meaningless until you have a statement
> that use of SSL is required.
I can't agree with this. If a user types an https URL, say
Tony Finch wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Ben Laurie wrote:
Tony Finch wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Ted Lemon wrote:
Paul's comment (the first of the three articles you quoted) implies
that secure NXDOMAIN is not a feature of Ohta-san's proposal. That
seems like a bit of a problem, be
Tony Finch wrote:
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Ted Lemon wrote:
Paul's comment (the first of the three articles you quoted) implies that
secure NXDOMAIN is not a feature of Ohta-san's proposal. That seems like a
bit of a problem, because fake domains are definitely a useful phishing tool.
As far as
Roy Arends wrote:
> During the last meeting, Kurtis Lindquist asked an interesting question.
> He asked if anyone had a good explanation for the amount of requests for
> the now experimental type A6 Resource Record. This exact question was
> asked by David Malone during the OARC meeting (july 2005)
Edward Lewis wrote:
> At 10:55 + 2/19/07, Tony Finch wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Edward Lewis wrote:
>>>
>>> 3) I don't buy this as a security risk. I don't think there is a
>>> problem
>>> here.
>>
>> It allows you to use a DNS server to tunnel past a firewall. It allows
>> you
>> to use
