Mark Andrews:
> domain ENAME domain {0|1} [type list of included / excluded types]
> (0 == include, 1 == exclude)
Mark,
I currently don't see, why ENAME will be usefull. Could you (or other)
clarify in which scenario ENAME would be helpfull?
Or what like to ask:
How has my pr
Chris,
thanks for the detailed, helpfully answer.
Andreas
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Hello,
I was requested to delegate a new subzone to nameservers with private
ip addresses.
I know it's at least not what makes me happy. But are there IETF
recommendations against this?
That would help me to drop the request.
Thanks
Andreas
___
Zitat von Nicholas Weaver :
One thought on DNSSEC and this (nytimes.com) attack.
Nickolas,
your suggestion try to solve the problem by inspecting common behaviour.
What about providing a policy statement?
I imagine an extension, where the subdomain declares an explicit
statement to the TL
