ISC runs a monthly survey of DNS statistics:
https://ftp.isc.org/www/survey/reports/current/fpdns.txt (this is from
January 2017).
Information about the survey is here:
https://ftp.isc.org/www/survey/reports/current/survey.html
Not sure how useful their data is, but they have been doing it for a
lo
On 12/20/2016 at 10:17 AM, "tjw ietf" wrote:
The draft is available
here:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vixie-dns-rpz/
Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for
adoption by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your
view.
Please also indicate if you are
On 12/20/2016 at 12:31 AM, "ac" wrote:
> If you wish to consider a physical analog, there may be a general
> principle that one should not interfere with postal mail, but this
is
> challeged by the existence of the unabomber or the anthrax attacks.
>
In your example, you still require a court or
> On Nov 15, 2016, at 3:09 AM, tjw ietf wrote:
>
> All
>
> The response from the room today was pretty positive this draft was worth
> adopting and pursuing. We felt their was little benefit in waiting to begin
> this Call for Adoption.
>
> This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-dicki
:What's to stop someone
from writing that malware today? Keeping the net safe by reducing
the expressiveness of what is carried over HTTP is already a lost
cause, and would have been a slender reed to rely on for security in
any case.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Allan Liska wrote:
On
On 7/12/2016 at 4:10 PM, "Shane Kerr" wrote:John,
At 2016-07-11 23:50:05 -
"John Levine" wrote:
> I'd also want to change some of the motivation text. To me, by far
> the most likely scenario here is javascript applications that want
to
> do DNS queries, e.g. for SRV, but can't because java
