We'd end up adding stuff to a response in order to make it shorter.
Is there a clear benefit (shorter responses)? Can you show me a few real world
examples?
Thanks
Roy
> On 8 Dec 2015, at 20:37, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>
> In message , Paul Wouters
> wr
> ites:
>>
>>> Subject: Re: [DNSOP]
> On 9 Aug 2015, at 01:11, manning
> there are other DNS Kill Switches still out there.
Yeah? Which ones?
Roy
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> On 23 Feb 2015, at 13:00, Hosnieh Rafiee wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there any single document for all DNS terms to be used as a reference in
> order to avoid defining them in a document. The terms I am looking for is all
> general DNS terms -- authoritative name server, resolver, client, host
https://blog.cloudflare.com/help-us-test-our-dnssec-implementation/
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
Hiya,
I really like this idea. Many ISPs already do this, (including some high
profile public recursives, like Google and OpenDNS), because it simply makes
sense: It reduces latency for the end user, reduces outbound traffic overhead,
eliminates an attack vector.
This specific document shouldn
On 02 Apr 2014, at 15:19, Jim Reid wrote:
> There's been a lot of noise and very little signal in the recent discussion.
>
> It would be helpful if there was real data on this topic. Is an RSA key of N
> bits too "weak" or too "strong"? I don't know. Is N bits "good enough"?
> Probably. Change
