What is the problem you are solving by having the indirection through the new
IANA registry? There are a zillion downsides to such an IANA registry, only a
few of which you cover in the current version of the draft.
Proposal 1: an EXTRA-TEXT field containing the template itself:
{
"temp
On Feb 28, 2025, at 13:22, Peter Thomassen
wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thank you for your suggestions, all of which are incorporated one way or
> another. Details below.
Looks good, one minor suggestion:
>
> NEW
> This document generalizes and extends the use of DNS NOTIFY (RFC
> 1996) bey
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, at 12:32, Peter Thomassen wrote:
> Here's a hybrid between the current and your proposed abstract; it's a
> little shorter and thus seems more "abstract-suited":
>
> NEW
> This document generalizes and extends the use of DNS NOTIFY (RFC
> 1996) beyond conventional zon
Hi Paul,
Thank you for your suggestions, all of which are incorporated one way or
another. Details below.
On 2/28/25 17:38, Paul Wouters wrote:
I guess it wasn't as clear to me that this was really providing just a "hint for
action", as can also seen by my further comments below.
How about ma
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:19 AM Peter Thomassen wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thank you very much for your thorough review!
>
Thanks for the detailed response as well!
As for SVCB, the WG has discussed this on various occasions and rejected
> the idea. [...]
Thanks for the pointers to those discussi
Hi Roman,
Thank you very much for your review!
On 2/27/25 20:31, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker wrote:
--
COMMENT:
--
Thank you to Peter E. Yee for the GENART
Hi Paul,
Thank you very much for your thorough review!
On 2/26/25 04:11, Paul Wouters via Datatracker wrote:
--
DISCUSS:
--
I have a few questions and suggest
Hi all,
In case you are interested, please note the below side meeting at the upcoming
IETF meeting, on PQ DNSSEC research.
Best,
Peter + Caspar
Forwarded Message
Subject: [Pq-dnssec] Re: Agenda for IETF 122 side meeting
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 14:13:23 +0100
From: Peter Thom
