Reviewer: Yoav Nir
Review result: Has Issues
Hi.
I agree with what the draft says, and also wth Barry Leiba's comments about
terminology. Still, there are two things in the draft text that stood out as
strange:
In the introduction, we have "DNSSEC [RFC9364] originally made extensive use of
SHA-1
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Compact Denial of Existence in DNSSEC'
(draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-07.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Domain Name System Operations Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Warren Kumari and Mahe
> Most people are aware of their untrustworthiness, though, which is not limited
> just to DNS resolution. It would be nice if devices had a reliable concept of
> "home
> network" and "away network" and applied different UXs and protections.
Windows had that exact same thought many years ago, and
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify-06: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
[ - IESG for clutter]
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 1:21 PM, Shumon Huque wrote:
> This revision addresses all the IESG review feedback.
>
Ta!
Also thanks to Murray for the discussion and clearing his DISCUSS; I've
just approved publication.
Much thanks to the authors and WG,
W
> Shumon.
>
> ---
> Il 27/02/2025 11:18 CET Mark Nottingham ha
> scritto:
>
> > On 27 Feb 2025, at 8:55 pm, Vittorio Bertola
> > wrote:
> >
> > This depends on the definition of "censorship", and also on whether you
> > envisage this system only for EDE 17 (user-requested blocking) or also for
> > EDE 16 a
This revision addresses all the IESG review feedback.
Shumon.
-- Forwarded message -
From:
Date: Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 1:16 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-07.txt
To: Christian Elmerot , Olafur Gudmundsson <
o...@ogud.com>, Shu
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-07.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations (DNSOP) WG
of the IETF.
Title: Compact Denial of Existence in DNSSEC
Authors: Shumon Huque
Christian Elmerot
Olafur Gudmundsso
Dear all,
This updated version of the Delegation Revalidation by DNS Resolvers
draft has the review feedback from Duane Wessels addressed. More
specifically:
* The abstract is corrected to mention that the idea is to revalidate
"at the expiration of the TTL of either the parent or child N
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dnsop-ns-revalidation-09.txt is now available. It is
a work item of the Domain Name System Operations (DNSOP) WG of the IETF.
Title: Delegation Revalidation by DNS Resolvers
Authors: Shumon Huque
Paul Vixie
Willem Toorop
Name:draft-i
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 8:09 AM Christian Elmerot
wrote:
> Thank you for the helpful review, Murray!
>
> >
> > Why the "SHOULD" in Section 3.1? What is the impact if I don't do
> > that? Why
> > might I legitimately choose not to do that? "SHOULD" implies there
> > are answers
Thank you for the helpful review, Murray!
On 2025-02-23 12:35, Shumon Huque wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 3:17 AM Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> wrote:
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existen
Hi Vittorio,
I'm going to answer your questions from my standpoint, but realise that the
browser folks may not agree with what I say, or have additional context. Much
of the draft's design is attempting to be responsive to them, and I don't want
to try to represent their positions too much.
>
> Il 26/02/2025 08:20 CET Mark Nottingham ha
> scritto:
>
> The intent is not to scale to that degree -- indeed, that would be considered
> a failure, because it would indicate widespread censorship on the Internet.
> Instead, it's to selectively surface legally mandated censorship when it
14 matches
Mail list logo
