[DNSOP] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify-06

2025-02-20 Thread Tony Li via Datatracker
Reviewer: Tony Li Review result: Has Nits OPSDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify-06 Reviewer: Tony Li Disclaimer: I am not a DNS expert and I do not play one on TV. I have not helped with DNS operations since the 1980's. I am not up to speed on DNSsec. I'm sorry, but I cannot devot

[DNSOP] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost-03

2025-02-20 Thread Geoff Huston via Datatracker
Reviewer: Geoff Huston Review result: Ready I was assigned as the dnsdir reviewer for draft-ietf-dnsop-must-not-ecc-gost-03. For more information about the DNS Directorate, please see https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/dnsdir The document is clear, concise and in my view, ready for publication. ___

[DNSOP] Mahesh Jethanandani's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify-06

2025-02-20 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani via Datatracker
Mahesh Jethanandani has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) P

[DNSOP] Re: New Draft: Standardized Query Name for DNS Resolver Reachability Probes

2025-02-20 Thread Ben Schwartz
Hi Duane, >> risk of implementation fingerprinting due to the distinctive QTYPE. > I think you mean QNAME here? No, this is about QTYPE. If your software is the only codebase that uses the QTYPE "MAILB" for DNS probes, then that's a very distinctive fingerprint. Distinctive QNAMEs are also hi

[DNSOP] Re: New Draft: Standardized Query Name for DNS Resolver Reachability Probes

2025-02-20 Thread Wessels, Duane
> On Feb 19, 2025, at 8:00 PM, Ben Schwartz > wrote: > > Hi DNSOP, > > John Todd, Puneet Sood, and myself have just posted a new draft [1] with a > very simple premise: if you're sending queries to a resolver just to see if > you get a response, query "probe.resolver.arpa". This name is (p

[DNSOP] Last Call: (Deprecate usage of ECC-GOST within DNSSEC) to Proposed Standard

2025-02-20 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG (dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'Deprecate usage of ECC-GOST within DNSSEC' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please s

[DNSOP] Last Call: (Deprecating the use of SHA-1 in DNSSEC signature algorithms) to Proposed Standard

2025-02-20 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG (dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'Deprecating the use of SHA-1 in DNSSEC signature algorithms' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on thi

[DNSOP] Last Call: (DNSSEC Cryptographic Algorithm Recommendation Update Process) to Informational RFC

2025-02-20 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG (dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'DNSSEC Cryptographic Algorithm Recommendation Update Process' as Informational RFC This document is part of a cluster of 3 DNSOP WG documents and it is recommended to start

[DNSOP] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2025-02-20 Thread Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence-06: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)