OK. Erik, Mike, Paul: Let me know if you have any further comments on #18.
--Ben
From: Sean Turner
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2024 3:06 PM
To: draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech.auth...@ietf.org
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org WG ; TLS List
Subject: Re: [TLS] [DNSOP] Re: Re: Re: Re
Authors (Ben, Mike, and Eric),
Thank for the PR with some examples:
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-svcb-ech/pull/18
Once you’ve settled the debate (hopefully before Monday), please go ahead and
merge so that Paul can get the IETF LC started.
Cheers,
spot
> On Oct 9, 2024, at 09:38, Se
Warren Kumari writes:
> Robert, if you'd like to propose standardizing SHA-512 for use in DS
> records please propose this in an Internet Draft — there is a
> helpful page here:
> https://authors.ietf.org/en/home
And if you do, note that next unassigned algorithm value is 7, not 5.
5 is GOST R 34
Ondřej Surý wrote:
I am quite confused as SHA-512 is not standardized for use in DS records:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ds-rr-types/ds-rr-types.xhtml
I believe this change should be rejected until (and if) SHA-512 is standardized
to use in DS records.
Indeed it should be rejected, bu
Hi,
Thanks for the feedbacks. The Working Group Last Call is finished and
authors will update the document with the received feed backs and publish a
new version.
Yours,
Daniel
On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 1:23 PM Robert Moskowitz
wrote:
> CAA should be expanded on first use.
>
> DRIP expansion (in
Yup, I agree.
While what is being proposed may be the right thing to do, the Errata
process is not the appropriate way to accomplish this.
>From "IESG Processing of RFC Errata for the IETF Stream" (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-iesg-processing-of-rfc-errata-for-the-ietf-stream-
This is a purposely technical change to the document, and thus should be
rejected. It is not an errata at all.
The correct way to ask for a technical change such as this is to first ask the
DNSOP WG, then possibly write a draft.
___
DNSOP mailing list
Hi,
Just a gentle reminder that the draft cutoff for Dublin is next Monday at
midnight UTC, and draft WG agendas are due a week from today, also at midnight
UTC.
If you have a draft or a request for agenda time in DNSOP, please get those
submitted.
Much thanks,
Suzanne, Tim, and Benno
___
Hi,
I am quite confused as SHA-512 is not standardized for use in DS records:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ds-rr-types/ds-rr-types.xhtml
I believe this change should be rejected until (and if) SHA-512 is standardized
to use in DS records.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)
My working ho
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8624,
"Algorithm Implementation Requirements and Usage Guidance for DNSSEC".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8144
--
Type:
Dear colleagues,
This call for adoption is now closed.
The chairs have reviewed the comments and we see enough support for this draft
to adopt it.
Thanks to everyone who commented. Several of you seemed to feel it’s a sound
framework but it might need substantial work— please continue the disc
11 matches
Mail list logo
