Thanks for your review.
On Aug 2, 2024, at 07:06, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker
wrote:
> Summary:
>
> The document is clear and detailed in all its technical aspects. I have two
> issues that I would suggest to be addressed before approval. If they are
> already addressed indirectly I would be
Hi Paul,
is the other thread dealing with these errata on dnsop? Mail archive
searches for RFC8640 and errata report 8038 were unsuccessful. Would be
glad to be pointed to it.
@Eric, does your statement on errata report 8037 (RFC4035) also apply to
the very similar errata report 8038 (RFC684
Elias,
I will have to read erratum report 8038 (RFC6840) for a definitive answer, but
the IESG statement and my explanations about erratum report 8037 probably apply.
Regards
-éric
From: Elias Heftrig
Date: Friday, 2 August 2024 at 17:29
To: Paul Hoffman , Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Cc: Rose, Sc
On 02. 08. 24 16:40, Paul Hoffman wrote:
THanks for keeping in on this!
On Aug 2, 2024, at 02:14, Petr Špaček wrote:
On 02. 08. 24 2:41, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Aug 1, 2024, at 06:37, Petr Špaček wrote:
snip <<< I removed the parts where we understood each other.
On 01. 08. 24 2:28, Paul
On Aug 2, 2024, at 08:29, Elias Heftrig wrote:
>
> is the other thread dealing with these errata on dnsop? Mail archive searches
> for RFC8640 and errata report 8038 were unsuccessful. Would be glad to be
> pointed to it.
The thread is not dealing with this erratum report (which is not an err
THanks for keeping in on this!
> On Aug 2, 2024, at 02:14, Petr Špaček wrote:
>
> On 02. 08. 24 2:41, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> On Aug 1, 2024, at 06:37, Petr Špaček wrote:
>> snip <<< I removed the parts where we understood each other.
>>>
>>> On 01. 08. 24 2:28, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> 2
On Aug 2, 2024, at 06:11, Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
wrote:
>
> As you kindly added me in cc, Iet me chime in (after a couple of PTO days):
> per the IESG statement on errata processing [1]:
> - as the errata clearly does not represent the DNSEXT WG intent at the
> publication time, this erratum c
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For mo
Paul, [adding dnsop]
As you kindly added me in cc, Iet me chime in (after a couple of PTO days): per
the IESG statement on errata processing [1]:
- as the errata clearly does not represent the DNSEXT WG intent at the
publication time, this erratum cannot be “verified”
- nevertheless, it can be “
On 02. 08. 24 2:41, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Aug 1, 2024, at 06:37, Petr Špaček wrote:
snip <<< I removed the parts where we understood each other.
On 01. 08. 24 2:28, Paul Hoffman wrote:
2.4. Converting from XML to DNSKEY Records
The published trust anchor does not provide values for DNSKEY p
10 matches
Mail list logo
