see inline.
On Sunday, July 7, 2024 3:55:36 PM PDT David Farmer wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I think this might be a little easier for people to parse, and I think it
> covers everything in yours;
that attempt is visible, but there's a fine point it loses.
> R3. UDP responders should compose response dat
Paul,
I think this might be a little easier for people to parse, and I think it
covers everything in yours;
R3. UDP responders should compose response datagrams whose size does not
exceed the requestor's offered buffer size (EDNS bufsize) or the interface
MTU, the route MTU, or the path MTU, if
Looks like the second WG mailing list fell off of this thread. See below for
history. I realize
that the text I proposed to Mr. Farmer was incoherent, so here's a second try:
R3. UDP responders should compose response datagrams whose size does not
exceed either the policy maximum if specified,
Issues
--
* ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques (+6/-21/💬61)
6 issues created:
- review uses of and capitalize Intermediary (by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/130
- review uses of " (by moo
