[DNSOP] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-06

Hi Joe, Thank you for clarifying.  I'm in agreement with current text then: unsigned decimal integer Shawn. -- On 6/7/24 9:04 PM, to...@strayalpha.com wrote: Hi, all, On Jun 7, 2024, at 5:21 PM, Shawn Emery wrote: On 6/6/24 1:53 PM, Wessels, Duane wrote: Hi Shawn, Thank you for the re

[DNSOP] Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-06

Hi, all, > On Jun 7, 2024, at 5:21 PM, Shawn Emery wrote: > > On 6/6/24 1:53 PM, Wessels, Duane wrote: >> Hi Shawn, >> >> Thank you for the review and comments. >> >> We’ve fixed the editorial comments you identified. >> >> Regarding “decimal integer” — we use that phrase only when describing

[DNSOP] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-06

Hi DW, On 6/6/24 1:53 PM, Wessels, Duane wrote: Hi Shawn, Thank you for the review and comments. We’ve fixed the editorial comments you identified. Regarding “decimal integer” — we use that phrase only when describing the presentation format (versus, say, hexadecimal) so we think it is approp

[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] [DNSOP]Requesting final comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis

Sorry, I noticed my first comment was particularly deformed. Below that first comment corrected into something (hopefully) more readable. Op 07-06-2024 om 10:33 schreef jab...@strandkip.nl: More substantially, this section describes a series of vulnerabilities that would be mitigated by signin

[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] [DNSOP]Requesting final comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis

Hi Joe, Comments inline. Op 07-06-2024 om 10:33 schreef jab...@strandkip.nl: Hi Tim, all, On Jun 7, 2024, at 01:11, Tim Wicinski wrote: On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 12:28 PM Paul Hoffman wrote: Tim jumped the gun by about an hour: we just submitted the -05. It incorporates the suggested text

[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] [DNSOP]Requesting final comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis

On Jun 7, 2024, at 10:33, jab...@strandkip.nl wrote: > More substantially, this section describes a series of vulnerabilities that > would be mitigated by signing the ROOT-SERVERS.NET > zone. I'm sorry about all these awful http expansions. I don't why, having typed w

[DNSOP] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-zoneversion-06

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review result: Ready This document aims Informational RFC status. It defines an DNS ZONEVERSION option (as per RFC 6891) which is a way for DNS clients to request, and for authoritative DNS servers to provide, information regarding the version of the zone from which a respo

[DNSOP] Re: [Ext] [DNSOP]Requesting final comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis

Hi Tim, all, On Jun 7, 2024, at 01:11, Tim Wicinski wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 12:28 PM Paul Hoffman wrote: > >> Tim jumped the gun by about an hour: we just submitted the -05. It >> incorporates the suggested text from below; you can see the diff at: >>https://author-tools.ietf.org/