[DNSOP] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-09

2023-09-20 Thread Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker
Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review result: Ready Thank you for this update. I found it very useful and easy to read. It is great it covers lot of the advances since RFC8499. Minor = * I would have thought that DSO [RFC8490] could warrant a mention here, but I could not see any discussion on th

Re: [DNSOP] Paul Wouters' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-07: (with COMMENT)

2023-09-20 Thread Paul Wouters
works for me, thanks! Paul On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 7:47 PM Wessels, Duane wrote: > > > > On Sep 20, 2023, at 2:23 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > > > > > >>> To prevent such unnecessary DNS traffic, security-aware resolvers > >>> MUST cache DNSSEC validation failures, with some restrict

Re: [DNSOP] Paul Wouters' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-07: (with COMMENT)

2023-09-20 Thread Wessels, Duane
> On Sep 20, 2023, at 2:23 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > > >>> To prevent such unnecessary DNS traffic, security-aware resolvers >>> MUST cache DNSSEC validation failures, with some restrictions. >>> >>> What are these "some restrictions" ? >> >> Here our intention is to update this

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-09-20 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Sep 20, 2023, at 2:48 PM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 5:22 PM Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Sep 20, 2023, at 3:23 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker > wrote: > > -- > > DISCUSS: > > ---

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-09-20 Thread Zaheduzzaman Sarker
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 5:22 PM Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Sep 20, 2023, at 3:23 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > -- > > DISCUSS: > > -

Re: [DNSOP] Paul Wouters' Yes on draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-07: (with COMMENT)

2023-09-20 Thread Paul Wouters
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023, Wessels, Duane wrote: Section 4.7 of RFC 4035 talks about the “BAD cache” where an implementation can cache data with invalid signatures. It says: o Since RRsets that fail to validate do not have trustworthy TTLs, the implementation MUST assign a TTL. This TTL SHOULD

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-thomassen-dnsop-generalized-dns-notify

2023-09-20 Thread pmev...@godaddy.com
> This note starts a Call for Adoption for > draft-thomassen-dnsop-generalized-dns-notify. > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomassen-dnsop-generalized-dns-notify/ > > Some time in the next two weeks, please review this draft to see if you think > it is s

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-09-20 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Sep 20, 2023, at 3:23 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker wrote: > -- > DISCUSS: > -- > > Thanks for working on this documentation. > > I have one point

Re: [DNSOP] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-07: (with COMMENT)

2023-09-20 Thread Zaheduzzaman Sarker
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 8:32 PM Wessels, Duane wrote: > > > > On Sep 7, 2023, at 2:32 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > -- > > COMMENT: > > --

[DNSOP] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's Discuss on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2023-09-20 Thread Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker
Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-09: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer t