[DNSOP] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-09: (with COMMENT)

2023-09-16 Thread Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [DNSOP] [Last-Call] [Ext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-09

2023-09-16 Thread Vijay Gurbani
On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 11:01 AM Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Sep 15, 2023, at 6:01 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: > [...] > > On the other hand, spending a week or two repeating a cycle to get an > important term in the current document seems like a better solution. > > If the WG agrees that this is an impo

Re: [DNSOP] [Last-Call] [Ext] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8499bis-09

2023-09-16 Thread Paul Hoffman
On Sep 15, 2023, at 6:01 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: > >> This is the first time someone has suggested this, even though you're right >> that it is a term we still sometimes here. I think it is unwise to add this >> this late in the review cycle (it's already on the telechat agenda, and a >> new def

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Question regarding RFC 7793

2023-09-16 Thread Paul Hoffman
This is the wrong mailing list to get help with your individual problem. You really need to get advice from the device vendor or their support forums. Good luck! --Paul Hoffman ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinf