Re: [DNSOP] Multiple drafts discussing the use of DNS NOTIFY

Hi, On 6/10/23 21:42, Tim Wicinski wrote: All The chairs have been looking at two different drafts discussing the use of using DNS NOTIFY to update DNSSEC information.  The two drafts are: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-thomassen-dnsop-generalized-dns-notify-01

Re: [DNSOP] Generalized DNS Notifications (draft-thomassen-dnsop-generalized-dns-notify-01)

Hi, I like this draft because of it tackles the issues of wasteful CDS polling and it uses NOTIFY, a mechanism that is well known, already exists in implementations, and actually feels like a good fit (as opposed to overloading). A note on where to send CDS and CSYNC notifications. I sort

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: Consistency for CDS/CDNSKEY and CSYNC is Mandatory

Hi, From the draft: For example, a single provider may (accidentally or maliciously) cause another provider's trust anchors and/or nameservers to be removed from the delegation. This is exactly what happened in my test environment when putting BIND 9 to the multi-signer test where one

[DNSOP] Call for Adoption: Consistency for CDS/CDNSKEY and CSYNC is Mandatory

> > This starts a Call for Adoption for draft-thomassen-dnsop-cds-consistency > > The draft is available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomassen-dnsop-cds-consistency/ > > > Please review this draft to s

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: Consistency for CDS/CDNSKEY and CSYNC is Mandatory

Hi, I like the ideas in this document and I support its adoption, willing to comment its contents. Libor Dne 07. 06. 23 v 17:52 Tim Wicinski napsal(a): All, We've had this document in DNSOP for a bit and Peter has presented three different meetings. When I went back and looked at the minu

Re: [DNSOP] Coming soon: WG interim meeting on the definition of "lame delegation"

Paul Hoffman wrote: Greetings again. A bunch of you have opinions in this area. In advance of our WG interim meeting on Tuesday, it would be grand if people with opinions would review those opinions and review the threads on the list where other peoples' opinions were expressed. This will make o

Re: [DNSOP] Coming soon: WG interim meeting on the definition of "lame delegation"

Hi all, Paul, On 17/06/2023 22:59, Paul Hoffman wrote: Greetings again. A bunch of you have opinions in this area. In advance of our WG interim meeting on Tuesday, it would be grand if people with opinions would review those opinions and review the threads on the list where other peoples' opin