Re: [DNSOP] rfc8499bis: lame

2023-06-10 Thread Havard Eidnes
> Then, how about we stop using "lame delegation" and use terms like > "imperfect delegation" or "incomplete delegation"? Hm, not sure I like either of those two alternatives. I'll give my reasons. In general, to my ear they sound very "generic". A delegation may be "perfect", meaning that it's

[DNSOP] Multiple drafts discussing the use of DNS NOTIFY

2023-06-10 Thread Tim Wicinski
All The chairs have been looking at two different drafts discussing the use of using DNS NOTIFY to update DNSSEC information. The two drafts are: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-thomassen-dnsop-generalized-dns-notify-01 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dsawp-notify-00 Mr

[DNSOP] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements-05.txt

2023-06-10 Thread Daniel Migault
Hi, Please find an update that takes into account all comments we received. I will respond to each reviewer individually later, but I would like to thank you all for the various reviews and comments provided. The main feedback we received was that the previous version was giving the message that r

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-validator-requirements-05.txt

2023-06-10 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This Internet-Draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations (DNSOP) WG of the IETF. Title : Recommendations for DNSSEC Resolvers Operators Authors : Daniel Migault