On 12 Apr 2023, at 21:37, Joe Abley wrote:
> With regard to a flock of drones providing service for a single nameserver I
> agree there are other exciting failure modes to look forward to. But, as
> before, I don't think we have a shortage of ways to describe them -- no need
> to economise by u
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 21:33, Patrik Fältström
wrote:
> On 12 Apr 2023, at 20:56, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
>
>> I have, or think I have, always understood the NS RRset at a zone
>> cut to advertise a set of delegations, each to a distinct server.
>
> And if you use anycast, where some of the serve
On 12 Apr 2023, at 20:56, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
> I have, or think I have, always understood the NS RRset at a zone
> cut to advertise a set of delegations, each to a distinct server.
And if you use anycast, where some of the servers in the anycast cloud respond
and some do not?
Patrik
sig
> Joe Abley> One nameserver in the delegation set of a particular
> Joe Abley> child zone might provide non-authoritative
> Joe Abley> responses. By my usage, that nameserver is lame for
> Joe Abley> that zone. The delegation of that zone to that
> Joe Abley> nameserver is a lame delegation. Ident
On 10 Apr 2023, at 20:42, Mats Dufberg wrote:
Delegation is an entity consisting of a set of name servers and, in
some cases, glue address records. One part of the delegation is to
provide the path to the child zone content.
While this may be a convenient way to consider things in an
administ
Joe Abley> One nameserver in the delegation set of a particular child zone
might provide
Joe Abley> non-authoritative responses. By my usage, that nameserver is lame
for that zone.
Joe Abley> The delegation of that zone to that nameserver is a lame delegation.
Identified
Joe Abley> when receiv
