On Nov 4, 2022, at 15:22, Ben Schwartz
wrote:
>>> I agree; this is about utility, not necessity. For example, records
>>> are almost never "necessary" in glue, but they are useful, so they are glue.
>>
>> Uh, what? For the kazillion peoeple on V6 only mobile networks, the
>> records
It appears that Ben Schwartz said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>I agree; this is about utility, not necessity. For example, records
>are almost never "necessary" in glue, but they are useful, so they are glue.
Uh, what? For the kazillion peoeple on V6 only mobile networks, the
record
On Nov 4, 2022, at 10:27, Ben Schwartz
wrote:
> I agree; this is about utility, not necessity. For example, records
> are almost never "necessary" in glue, but they are useful, so they are glue.
"First they came for the v6-only clients, and I did not speak out, because I
was not v6-onl
I agree; this is about utility, not necessity. For example, records
are almost never "necessary" in glue, but they are useful, so they are glue.
On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 7:24 AM libor.peltan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> regarding the question of "necessary" versus "useful". I apologize, but
> I must kin
Hi,
regarding the question of "necessary" versus "useful". I apologize, but
I must kind-of undermine the question.
Imagine that a delegation is supplemented with an SVCB record that
describes how to connect securely (with TLS) to the delegated
nameserver. (Dunno if this really can happen tod
Hi,
I'm trying to understand this, but not sure if I do. What I see is:
"The definition of bailiwick (in-b, out-of-b) is messed up and any
further use of it in normative documents will probably lead to
ambiguities. The proposed tactic is to stop using it and define a new
term (in-domain) whic
Hi DNS people!
We have talks about DNS over QUIC and on the impact of the war on the .ru
domain on the agenda. See below.
I believe this could be interesting for you and looking forward to see you at
the session on Thursday!
Mirja
On 04.11.22, 10:23, "Maprg on behalf of Mirja Kuehlewind"
