Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones

2022-09-22 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Tue, 2022-09-13 at 17:30 -0400, Tim Wicinski wrote: > As we mentioned during the last IETF the chairs plan on running working > group > last calls during the month of September.   > > This starts a Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog- > zones > > Current versions of the dr

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation

2022-09-22 Thread Brian Dickson
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 2:05 AM Kazunori Fujiwara wrote: > > From: Petr Špaček > >> Then, do you agree the following requirements ? (as DNS software > >> developpers) > >> 1. SHOULD set DF bit on outgoing UDP packets on IPv4, > >> and SHOULD not use FRAGMENT header on IPv6. > > > > Theoretic

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation

2022-09-22 Thread Joe Abley
Fujiwara-san, On Sep 22, 2022, at 11:05, Kazunori Fujiwara wrote: > Thanks. "Path MTU Disovery" API and setting IP_DF API are complex and > they often don't work as expected. > > However, it may be easy to avoid using the Fragment Header on IPv6. > (limit IPv6 response packet smaller than inter

Re: [DNSOP] WGLC for draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation

2022-09-22 Thread Kazunori Fujiwara
> From: Petr Špaček >> Then, do you agree the following requirements ? (as DNS software >> developpers) >> 1. SHOULD set DF bit on outgoing UDP packets on IPv4, >> and SHOULD not use FRAGMENT header on IPv6. > > Theoretically yes, but it might not be achievable depending on OS > API. We tried