Sure,
I meant that DNSSEC is also generally not used for the global names in such
an environment.
thanks,
Rob
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 13:42 Deen, Glenn wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
>
>
> I’ve learned never to say never in the world of Internet technologies as
> there are just too many clever people out
Hi Rob,
I’ve learned never to say never in the world of Internet technologies as there
are just too many clever people out there who like to some pretty wild hacks,
hence the “generally not used”.
-glenn
On 1/21/22, 1:33 PM, "Rob Sayre" mailto:say...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 a
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 1:15 PM Deen, Glenn wrote:
>
>1. Draft Agenda:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2022-add-01/materials/agenda-interim-2022-add-01-add-01-04
>
>
Hi Glenn,
The agenda says:
- "DNSSEC is generally not used for the non-global names in Do53 Split DNS
en
Updated reminder, with the correct Session Detail link:
Hi ADD, DNSOP & DPRIVE working groups,
This is a reminder of the upcoming joint Interim meeting on Encrypted DNS
Resolver discovery in Split DNS environment on January 26 at 1700-1830hrs UTC
Meeting details including how to join the remot
Hi ADD, DNSOP & DPRIVE working groups,
This is a reminder of the upcoming joint Interim meeting on Encrypted DNS
Resolver discovery in Split DNS environment on January 26 at 1700-1830hrs UTC
Meeting details including how to join the remote session:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim/r
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 10:08:48AM +,
Stephen Farrell wrote
a message of 231 lines which said:
> I made a test setup for my TLS/ECH work. [1] Happy to
> take PRs or tweak if it's useful to others.
It seems it does not address the same thing. I was thinking of testing
*actual* published SV
