On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 5:23 AM tom petch wrote:
> From: art on behalf of Bob Hinden <
> bob.hin...@gmail.com>
> Sent: 11 September 2021 17:03
>
> Hi Warren,
>
> > On Sep 10, 2021, at 4:19 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> >
> > > Seems reasonable to consider, assuming a BCP can update an
> Informatio
All
A Reminder that there is an upcoming DNSOP Interim meeting.
This will be happening at 2021-09-15 01:00 - 02:00 UTC.
Please adjust for your local time zone.
The Meetecho URL is:
https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/interim/?short=a910f22a-d46b-401f-be04-97c290437
214
Two items for discussion:
For the limit on total number of connections: "Absent any other
information,
150 is a reasonable value for this limit in most cases."
[...]
Maybe this could use a clarification that 150 is good advice only if
you _don't_ have any "TCP-only" clients, like e.g. DoT stubs?
I would not be so sure
From: art on behalf of Bob Hinden
Sent: 11 September 2021 17:03
Hi Warren,
> On Sep 10, 2021, at 4:19 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> > Seems reasonable to consider, assuming a BCP can update an Informational
> > RFC?
>
> Any RFC can update any previous RFC? There are some questions about the
>
