On 2021-02-19 18:45, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> However, "burning" a new RR just for this purpose seems to me to
> not be necessary, so I favour the scheme in 5.6 using a TXT
> record instead.
My reading of RFC 5507 "Design Choices When Expanding the DNS"
§6 ( https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5507#secti
Greetings all,
Viktor and I have been working on a BCP to provide guidance on selecting
reasonable NSEC3 parameters. We'd love your feedback and for dnsop to
consider adopting it.
A new version of I-D, draft-hardaker-dnsop-nsec3-guidance-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by Wes Hardaker
> During the last hackathon at IETF-109, a new idea emerged where the
> version of a member zone in a catalog (indicated by the member zone's
> SOA serial number) is also in the catalog. This can help ensuring
> dissemination of member zones in a catalog from the primary to the
> secondary nameserv
I'd like to request 20 minuted for draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-catalog-zones.
We have a lot to discuss!
Op 18-02-2021 om 17:23 schreef Benno Overeinder:
> Hi all,
>
> The IETF 110 Agenda is out https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/agenda.
>
> DNSOP has two sessions scheduled:
>
> dnsop Session
