The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8976,
"Message Digest for DNS Zones".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6425
--
Type: Technical
Reported by: Brian Wellington
On Feb 10, 2021, at 12:03 AM, Matthijs Mekking wrote:
>
> Personally I still think we shouldn't change these SHOULDs to MUSTs. Quoting
> from RFC 2119:
>
> 1. MUST This word, or the terms "REQUIRED" or "SHALL", mean that the
> definition is an absolute requirement of the specification.
>
>
Peter,
Personally I still think we shouldn't change these SHOULDs to MUSTs.
Quoting from RFC 2119:
1. MUST This word, or the terms "REQUIRED" or "SHALL", mean that the
definition is an absolute requirement of the specification.
3. SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean
