A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Revised IANA Considerations for DNSSEC
Author : Paul Hoffman
Filename: draft-i
On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 12:43 PM Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> *From:* DNSOP *On Behalf Of * Ben Schwartz
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 19, 2021 10:01 PM
> *To:* Martin Thomson
> *Cc:* dnsop
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [DNSOP] SVCB without A/ records at the
> service name
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue,
From: DNSOP On Behalf Of Ben Schwartz
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2021 10:01 PM
To: Martin Thomson
Cc: dnsop
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DNSOP] SVCB without A/ records at the service name
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 7:40 PM Martin Thomson
mailto:m...@lowentropy.net>> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2
All
Thanks for your patience in getting back to you the resolution of this
document. I had concerns about adopting the document in its current
form, which was my motivation for the suggestions on splitting the
registry. That spurred some healthy discussion. I also like the idea of
integratin
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 04:27:20PM -0500,
John Levine wrote
a message of 18 lines which said:
> They think DoH is swell, but not when it bypasses security controls
> and leaks info to random outside people
I will certainly do as the NSA says, since they are experts in
privacy-related issues
On 1/22/21 3:10 AM, Tom Pusateri wrote:
Would it be ok to allow DNSSEC signed responses from any server? If they’re
signed and verified, does it matter how you got them?
Another missing part is privacy, i.e. even if you get exactly the same
answers, it doesn't imply you get similar (privacy)
