Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: RZERC Draft Documents For Review

I support the deployment of ZONEMD in the root zone. This is a valuable protection today and a prerequisite for many of the proposals in DPRIVE. On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 4:26 PM Tim April wrote: > Hello DNSOP, > > Forwarding along to DNSOP as well. If you have any comments or feedback on > the t

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-02.txt

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 2:29 PM Eric Orth wrote: > Besides future-proofing for potential changes, I think the current rule > keeps us more flexible for handling obscure cornercases. If there's any > reasonable chance that some obscure usecase in the future might make it > difficult for an authori

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-02.txt

Besides future-proofing for potential changes, I think the current rule keeps us more flexible for handling obscure cornercases. If there's any reasonable chance that some obscure usecase in the future might make it difficult for an authoritative to ensure only one alias is in place, it seems to m

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-02.txt

a small matter. Ben Schwartz wrote on 2021-01-05 09:42: > > > On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 4:39 AM libor.peltan > wrote: > > Hi Ben, all, > i'd like to ask for some clarification of expected Authoritative > server behaviour around Alias SVCB records: > >

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-https-02.txt

On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 4:39 AM libor.peltan wrote: > Hi Ben, all, > i'd like to ask for some clarification of expected Authoritative server > behaviour around Alias SVCB records: > > 1) when there are multiple Alias SVCB records for an owner name, should > the Authoritative server put targeted r

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Call for Adoption: draft-hoffman-dnssec-iana-cons

> 4 янв. 2021 г., в 19:20, Stephen Farrell > написал(а): > > > Hiya, > > On 04/01/2021 16:05, Paul Wouters wrote: >> While asking is fair, you would also have to define what you >> do based on the outcome of that ask. You left that out, > > I don't think I did omit that. My stated reason to