mind if i cut in?
On Saturday, 25 April 2020 06:23:54 UTC Vladimír Čunát wrote:
> Original subject: New draft on delegation revalidation
>
> On 4/24/20 4:49 PM, Shumon Huque wrote:
> > ...
>
> ...
(agreeableness.)
> Still, note that for some consumers the secure transport may be an
> argument
Original subject: New draft on delegation revalidation
On 4/24/20 4:49 PM, Shumon Huque wrote:
>
> Even DNSSEC-validated NSs and IPs aren't sufficient to ensure privacy,
> so I'd rather kill this problem by proper encrypted protocol towards
> authoritatives (in current dprive charter).
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:29 AM Giovane C. M. Moura wrote:
> Hi Shumon,
>
> > The main recommendations in the draft are to: (1) deterministically
> > prefer the authoritative child NS set over the non-authoritative,
> > unsigned, delegating NS set in the parent
>
> This was a problem waiting to b
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 6:21 PM Gavin McCullagh
wrote:
>
>
>> [a] seems like a definition which could be changed if it was so decided.
>>> DS records are totally parent centric for example. It seems like NS could
>>> be too if we declared the in-zone NS to be "informational only". [...]
>>>
>>
Hi Shumon,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:32 PM Shumon Huque wrote:
But appreciating the subtleties of the DNS delegation mechanism involves a
> lot of arcane details that are not easy to understand for anyone. If the
> namespace is a tree, and zones are contiguous subtrees, how do you a
> visualize
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-15: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-15: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please ref
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Extended DNS Errors
Authors : Warren Kumari
Evan Hunt
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:17 AM Vittorio Bertola
wrote:
>
>
>
> > Il 23/04/2020 20:14 Warren Kumari ha scritto:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:04 AM Vittorio Bertola
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Indeed, thinking at the possible use case for those error codes, it would
> > > make sense for the for
> Il 23/04/2020 20:14 Warren Kumari ha scritto:
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 5:04 AM Vittorio Bertola
> wrote:
> >
> > Indeed, thinking at the possible use case for those error codes, it would
> > make sense for the forwarder to forward them to the final user. Perhaps we
> > can fix the lan
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:09 AM Vladimír Čunát
wrote:
> On 4/22/20 9:32 PM, Shumon Huque wrote:
> > Since delegation records and glue address records are unsigned, they
> > can be spoofed, and DNSSEC should really allow us to detect such
> > spoofing once a resolver sees referral data.
>
> I woul
11 matches
Mail list logo
