[DNSOP] dnsop - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 107

Dear Tim Wicinski, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request. dnsop Session 1 (2:00 requested) Wednesday, 25 March 2020, Morning Session I 1000-1200 Room Name: Regency C size: 300 -

Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts

Anthony Eden wrote: > My intention with the original draft I wrote > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dnsop-eden-alias-rr-type-00 was to > provide just the basics. If anyone is interested we can always try to > resuscitate that draft at some point. Thanks for that :-) Unfortunately it requires

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07

Thanks for the review! Answers to your questions here: On Feb 24, 2020, at 3:06 PM, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker wrote: > - What if > the node is not authorized to have the entire records? It would desirable for > the Resolvers to have all the records of the root zone. Is there any scenario > th

Re: [DNSOP] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07

Thanks, Ace, and post the update whenever you’re ready. Barry On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:18 AM Warren Kumari wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 8:02 AM Ines Robles via Datatracker > wrote: > > > > Reviewer: Ines Robles > > Review result: Ready with Nits > > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer

Re: [DNSOP] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 8:02 AM Ines Robles via Datatracker wrote: > > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair.

Re: [DNSOP] Last Call: (A Common Operational Problem in DNS Servers - Failure To Communicate.) to Best Current Practice

OK. If there is anything I or the other chairs can do to assist, let us know thanks tim On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 5:45 PM Ray Bellis wrote: > On 25/02/2020 14:52, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > > Any idea when will we see an updated version? > > We're looking at it, but the BIND release schedule and M

Re: [DNSOP] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07

Thank you for the fast response and clarification. Best, Ines. On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 3:15 PM Vladimír Čunát wrote: > On 2/28/20 2:02 PM, Ines Robles via Datatracker wrote: > > 1- Appendix B.5: it seems that the link is not valid: >resolver.readthedocs.io/en/stable/module

Re: [DNSOP] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07

Thanks for the review, Ines. Barry On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 5:02 AM Ines Robles via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF docu

Re: [DNSOP] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07

On 2/28/20 2:02 PM, Ines Robles via Datatracker wrote: > 1- Appendix B.5: it seems that the link is not valid: resolver.readthedocs.io/en/stable/modules.html#root-on-loopback-rfc- >7706> > > This link worked for me: > https://knot-resolver.readthedocs.io/en/stable/module

[DNSOP] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis-07

Reviewer: Ines Robles Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more i