Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts

2020-02-18 Thread Rob Sayre
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 8:17 AM Olli Vanhoja wrote: > > SVCB is active almost every day of the week in GitHub. > If someone wanted to follow this work, which GitHub repo is relevant? I found this one: https://github.com/MikeBishop/dns-alt-svc But I'm not sure that's the right one. thanks, Rob

Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts

2020-02-18 Thread Tommy Pauly
+1 to the liveness of SVCB. As seen in the work on GitHub, there’s engagement from people working on ESNI and other use cases. I’ve been following the draft on GitHub and testing implementations, for example. Tommy > On Feb 18, 2020, at 10:07 AM, Eric Orth > wrote: > > Hasn't been discussed

Re: [DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts

2020-02-18 Thread Olli Vanhoja
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, 16:20 Klaus Malorny wrote: > > I asked myself about the status of the two drafts. I got the impression a > little > bit that the svcb/httpsvc draft successfully killed the aname draft, but > is now > dying slowly itself. It would be great if somebody could give me some > ins

[DNSOP] status of the aname and svcb/httpsvc drafts

2020-02-18 Thread Klaus Malorny
Hi all, I asked myself about the status of the two drafts. I got the impression a little bit that the svcb/httpsvc draft successfully killed the aname draft, but is now dying slowly itself. It would be great if somebody could give me some insight whether the one or the other has still a meas