Re: [DNSOP] rrserial as a path to fame and fortune (was: Adoption of new EDNS opcode "rrserial")

2020-01-29 Thread Hugo Salgado
On 15:26 29/01, Vladimír Čunát wrote: > Hello. > > On 1/29/20 11:57 AM, Shane Kerr wrote: > > One possible application of this might be to allow a resolver to > > extend the TTL of an entire zone. > > Overall I suspect the TTL-extending use case might be sufficiently > different (and much more co

Re: [DNSOP] rrserial as a path to fame and fortune (was: Adoption of new EDNS opcode "rrserial")

2020-01-29 Thread Vladimír Čunát
Hello. On 1/29/20 11:57 AM, Shane Kerr wrote: > One possible application of this might be to allow a resolver to > extend the TTL of an entire zone. Overall I suspect the TTL-extending use case might be sufficiently different (and much more complicated) to consider separately/independently. > A

Re: [DNSOP] rrserial as a path to fame and fortune (was: Adoption of new EDNS opcode "rrserial")

2020-01-29 Thread Tony Finch
Shane Kerr wrote: > > * Returning the entire signed SOA in the additional section, rather than > just the serial in an EDNS record (for DNSSEC validation purposes). I think it would be more traditional to put it in the AUTHORITY section :-) Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/ Lough F

[DNSOP] rrserial as a path to fame and fortune (was: Adoption of new EDNS opcode "rrserial")

2020-01-29 Thread Shane Kerr
Hugo, On 27/01/2020 16.08, Hugo Salgado wrote: Dear DNSOPers, as an operator I tend to have this need to couple an answer for a query to an auth server, with the actual "SOA zone version" used. So I think it'll be valuable to have an EDNS option for it. Here I'm proposing it with this new draft