[DNSOP] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review result: Ready I apologize for the late review. Notifications still seem not to work, and I was not aware about this assignment until recently. I hope it does not come too late. This document identifies a number of common kinds of DNS queries to which some servers ei

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-14.txt

Eric Orth writes: > Took a look at the diff.  I believe this resolves all my previous > concerns. Awesome, thanks Eric. -- Wes Hardaker USC/ISI ___ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] future-proofing (Re: Working Group Last Call for: Message Digest for DNS Zones)

On 1/15/2020 8:39 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: On Jan 15, 2020, at 5:28 PM, Michael StJohns wrote: I think its a co-existence issue here. I don't think you should have two different (calculation-wise) ZONEMD-like RRSets in the same zone for the reasons you've mentioned. That makes good sense. Wh

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00.txt

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 4:32 AM Normen Kowalewski wrote: > Paul, Lada, > > > On the comment for the wording in the line after the example in 3 > . > YANG Design Considerations > > typedef dns-class-nam

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00.txt

Paul, Lada, On the comment for the wording in the line after the example in 3 . YANG Design Considerations typedef dns-class-name { type enumeration { enum IN { value 1;

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00.txt

Dear WG, Ladislav, Paul, after the reworked draft seems to address the main point that Paul had raised (Thanks for the work to Lada and Petr), I’d propose to positively revisit WG adoption, and fix remaining details as part of working on it? BR, Normen Kowalewski > On 17. Dec 2019, at 17:34,