We seem to have a fairly basic disagreement here about whether we can
expect people who implement ZONEMD to be familiar with the way that DNS
servers work. In pretty much all of the cases below, it seems to me that
if the answer to the question isn't obvious, you're not the audience for
this d
On 1/5/2020 2:00 PM, John Levine wrote:
In article <84650844-1d13-9377-c913-23dcbc76d...@nthpermutation.com> you write:
1) A recommendation for the maximum size of the zone (and for that
matter the maximum churn rate). This is hinted at in the abstract, but
missing from the body of the document.
In article <84650844-1d13-9377-c913-23dcbc76d...@nthpermutation.com> you write:
>1) A recommendation for the maximum size of the zone (and for that
>matter the maximum churn rate). This is hinted at in the abstract, but
>missing from the body of the document.
I don't get it. The draft makes it
On 03/01/2020 21:10, Christian Huitema wrote:
> Most of the early tests of QUIC were using port 4433, not 443. Using
> alternate ports for testing is very common.
Not just for testing - many people use alternate ports when port
forwarding to reach services inside a many-to-one NAT.
Ray
pEpkey
