Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-01.txt

2019-11-06 Thread Philip Homburg
>Philip Homburg pointed out that, although impractical to determine the >Client IP before Client Cookie construction, it is feasible for a Client >to detect it when it learns a Server Cookie from a specific Server. It >can subsequently be tried to be reused for the same Server which will >fail if

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-server-cookies-01.txt

2019-11-06 Thread Willem Toorop
Dear dnsop, This version has an updated Client Cookie construction section in which it is now REQUIRED to change a Client Cookie when the Client IP address changes. Previously (in versions before the previous version) the Client IP address was used in Cookie construction, however that turned out

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt

2019-11-06 Thread Matthew Pounsett
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 09:38, Ray Bellis wrote: > > > On 06/11/2019 13:42, Matthew Pounsett wrote: > > I still have a few comments. There were a few comments from my review > > of -13 that weren't responded to in email, and haven't been updated in > > the text, so I'm repeating them here. > > Hi

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt

2019-11-06 Thread Ray Bellis
On 06/11/2019 13:42, Matthew Pounsett wrote: I still have a few comments.  There were a few comments from my review of -13 that weren't responded to in email, and haven't been updated in the text, so I'm repeating them here. Hi Matt, We sought advice from one of the Chairs as to whether in

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt

2019-11-06 Thread Matthew Pounsett
I still have a few comments. There were a few comments from my review of -13 that weren't responded to in email, and haven't been updated in the text, so I'm repeating them here. As mentioned in my last review, Section 3 seems very confused about what it's trying to accomplish. Some subsections