Ladislav Lhotka writes:
> Paul Wouters writes:
>
>> I am also confused by the difference between deprecated and
>> obsoleted. I guess the yang model interprets the IANA regitry, but the
>> registry has no official column designation for this. I wonder if it
>> should be given one. I also then sug
On 13 Nov 2018, at 14:07, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Paul Wouters writes:
>
>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>>
>>> we would like to ask the working group to adopt the following I-D as a
>>> WG item:
>>>
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00
>>
Paul Wouters writes:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
>> we would like to ask the working group to adopt the following I-D as a
>> WG item:
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-00
>
> I'll leave that call up to the chairs bit it sounds like a go
Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> it's been quite useful for internal DNSSEC for non-public zones.
Yes.
(I would like something like DLV but with slightly different semantics,
so that it is used as a fallback when the parent zone isn't reachable,
as well as when it is reachable but missing the DS records.)
Paul Wouters wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Mark Andrews wrote:
DLV 32769 DNSSEC Lookaside Validation
DLV isn’t obsolete. The registry ISC published is gone but anyone can
publish their own
registry.
The question is if that is a bug or feature. I think it is a bug and its
time for the code
