On 15 Aug 2018, at 22:01, John C Klensin wrote:
> In that regard, I find the document's definition of "split DNS"
> a little bit frustrating, as I have seen (multiple times) a
> distinction made between names (or a zone) that would clearly be part of the
> public DNS except that they are hidden f
Paul,
Thanks for the thorough response. A few additional comments
below; I consider all of these to fall into the "things that
should be considered as the document is evaluated" category, not
anything resembling showstoppers.
--On Monday, August 13, 2018 23:56 + Paul Hoffman
wrote:
>...
