The point was to allow redistribution and to not depend on a trusted source
Sent from my phone
> On Aug 9, 2018, at 20:21, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 02:19:08PM +, Edward Lewis wrote:
>>
>> FWIW, this message was spurred by this comic strip [yes, today as I write]
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 02:19:08PM +, Edward Lewis wrote:
> FWIW, this message was spurred by this comic strip [yes, today as I write]:
> http://dilbert.com/strip/2018-08-09.
Cute.
> "Will the time taken to generate and verify this record add to the security
> of a zone transfer?"
Perhaps
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Decreasing Access Time to Root Servers by Running One
On The Same Server
Authors : Warren Kuma
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : Decreasing Access Time to Root Servers by Running One
On The Same Server
Authors : Warren Kuma
FWIW, this message was spurred by this comic strip [yes, today as I write]:
http://dilbert.com/strip/2018-08-09.
"Will the time taken to generate and verify this record add to the security of
a zone transfer?"
I understand that there is no protection for cut point or glue records now, nor
any
All
Thanks for all the comments on this draft. The Call for Adoption is
ending today but it seems that there is consensus to adopt this work in
DNSOP and support this work. The chairs thank everyone for the feedback.
Authors should upload a new version with the draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis
All
Thanks for all the comments on this draft. The Call for Adoption is
ending today but it seems that there is consensus to adopt this work in
DNSOP and support this work. The chairs thank everyone for the feedback.
Authors should upload a new version with the
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc7816bi
