On 7 April 2018 at 07:29, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
>
> i am generally supportive of this approach; in fact i wish i'd thought of
> it. the specifics will be different, as in:
>
> /proxy_dns?proto=tcp
> /proxy_dns?proto=udp
>
> but i agree that encoding the original transport in the URI is better than
>
> On 7 Apr 2018, at 00:29, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> i object, as before, to "dns-udpwireformat" as a name. these are dns
> messages, which when carried by udp are raw, and when carried in tcp are
> preceded by a two-octet length indicator for framing of multiple messages
> sharing the same strea
Hi Suzanne, Warren, DNSOP WG,
> On 7 Apr 2018, at 04:09, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 5:49 PM, Suzanne Woolf wrote:
>>
>>
>> WG vendors/implementers: Can folks who have implemented kskroll-sentinel, or
>> considered implementing it, please speak up on your concerns/plans?
