On 02/28/2018 12:21 PM, Jim Hague wrote:
We'll discuss this. We absolutely meant for negative keys to be
restricted to closed systems. Allowing string keys in addition is an
interesting idea; off the cuff, I wonder whether folk will want to pay
the file space penalty.
The cost of interoperabilit
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : A Sentinel for Detecting Trusted Keys in DNSSEC
Authors : Geoff Huston
Thanks for the update.
IMO this document really needs a Privacy Considerations section and maybe also
some additions to the Security Considerations. Whereas the signals in 8145 are
between the validator and the zone owner, this technique enables third parties
(with either good or bad intention
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the IETF.
Title : A Sentinel for Detecting Trusted Keys in DNSSEC
Authors : Geoff Huston
On 28/02/2018 06:36, Richard Gibson wrote:
> Thank you so much for the changes, I am confident that this format is
> now in a state where my organization could build on top of it to suit
> our needs.
Thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated!
> * Section 6.2.1 and 7.5.3.4: At minimum, RR field "tt
On 23/02/2018 12:56, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 12:31:29PM +,
> Sara Dickinson wrote
> a message of 51 lines which said:
>
>> We have an update to draft which we hope captures all the comments
>> to-date.
>
> I think so, too. At least, it captured mine :-)
Good.
