Stephane,
Thanks for reading the draft and for your comments. I will
study them and see what I can do and will get back to you if I
have questions. One general observation: I've tried, when
mentioning possible alternate approaches, to provide a partial
existence proof that alternatives are possi
The IESG has received a request from the Domain Name System Operations WG
(dnsop) to consider the following document: - 'Special-Use Domain Names
Problem Statement'
as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please
draft-klensin-dns-function-considerations is an interesting document
so I take the liberty to copy dnsop, which may be interested.
A few remarks about the -01 version:
It does not seem to mention other naming systems, except a short
reference to "blockchains" (there are many of naming systems, ea
Regards, Benoit.
A new version (-05) has been submitted for draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-05.txt
The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/
Diff from previous vers
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF.
Title : Special-Use Domain Names Problem Statement
Authors : Ted Lemon
Ralph Drom
Hi Ralph,
Just checking if you might get to this? If not I *think I can do it at
~noon eastern.
W
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Ralph Droms wrote:
> Thanks for the review and helpful comments, Benoit.
>
> Ted, Warren - I'm login to be tied up with some family stuff through the
> weekend. If n
