[DNSOP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09: (with COMMENT)

2016-11-29 Thread Ben Campbell
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please ref

Re: [DNSOP] NSEC3 aggressive use for unsigned zones

2016-11-29 Thread Mukund Sivaraman
Hi Shane On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 02:53:49PM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote: > John, > > At 2016-11-27 15:18:18 - > "John Levine" wrote: > > > >What are the consequences of the authoritiative server returning > > >synthesized unsigned NSEC3 RRs upon being signalled by the resolver > > >using an EDN

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any

2016-11-29 Thread Niall O'Reilly
On 28 Nov 2016, at 20:00, Edward Lewis wrote: > Please don't use the word random, not even in quotes, in this context. +1 A good word might be "arbitrary" (NL: willekeurig). Niall signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ DNSOP m

Re: [DNSOP] DNSSEC operational issues long term

2016-11-29 Thread Olafur Gudmundsson
> On Nov 16, 2016, at 5:05 AM, George Michaelson wrote: > > On the current timeline, October 11 -> January 11 so three months. > > Vendors of sealed units who ship equipment from before October 11 with > delivery held up for three months at the docks by a strike, or people > who put the sealed

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any

2016-11-29 Thread Matthijs Mekking
On 28-11-16 16:43, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote: > >> On Nov 28, 2016, at 5:25 AM, Matthijs Mekking > > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have read the draft and have two comments. Both of these have been >> called out before, but I don't see them addressed in this version (-03):

Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any

2016-11-29 Thread Matthijs Mekking
On 28-11-16 16:50, Tony Finch wrote: > Olafur Gudmundsson wrote: > >> There have been some discussion on this topic, It is fair to say that >> there are 3 camps >> >> a) answer with the smallest RRSET >> b) pick one at “random" >> c) select bases on what is most useful (i.e. deterministic selecti