https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-fujiwara-dnsop-resolver-update-00.txt
Why can't a cache store the trustworthiness [RFC 2181] as metadata for the
RRset, instead of having another cache?
I understand why now we don't want one set to clobber the other, that being
"because of abuse." Back in the day
On 11/13/16 6:16 AM, Edward Lewis wrote:
> I read through the document and had a lot of comments, so maybe I need to
> "back up a bit."
>
> I'm conflicted over documents that define good operational practices over top
> of a standard protocol. There's much evidence we need this, for example,
>
I read through the document and had a lot of comments, so maybe I need to "back
up a bit."
I'm conflicted over documents that define good operational practices over top
of a standard protocol. There's much evidence we need this, for example, just
to pick one, the number of TLD zones with very
