> On 1 Nov. 2016, at 11:22 am, George Michaelson wrote:
>
> The net effect is the same in respect of new algorithms. I'm fine with
> checking conformance if the algorithm is known, it feels like a low
> bar.
>
> Rejecting sigs because you don't know how to check feels like a huge
> impediment t
The net effect is the same in respect of new algorithms. I'm fine with
checking conformance if the algorithm is known, it feels like a low
bar.
Rejecting sigs because you don't know how to check feels like a huge
impediment to technology: The use of the new algorithm is now gated by
the ability of
> On 1 Nov. 2016, at 3:37 am, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
>
>
>
> On 31 October 2016 at 00:22, George Michaelson wrote:
> It is only my personal opinion, but I believe registrars are incorrect
> in performing crypto alg checks on proffered DS, and this is an
> entirely unwarranted, and incorrect
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF.
Title : DNS Session Signaling
Authors : Ray Bellis
Stuart Cheshire
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF.
Title : Reverse DNS in IPv6 for Internet Service Providers
Author : Lee Howard
Filename: d
Hi All,
We have just published a new draft on a proposed format for DNS packet capture
- please see below for details. We would very much appreciate feedback on the
overall problem discussed here in addition to the details of the format
proposed.
Please note: There are three diagrams in this
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF.
Title : Special-Use Names Problem Statement
Authors : Ted Lemon
Ralph Droms
On 31 October 2016 at 00:22, George Michaelson wrote:
> It is only my personal opinion, but I believe registrars are incorrect
> in performing crypto alg checks on proffered DS, and this is an
> entirely unwarranted, and incorrect understanding of their role. It
> conflates one public good (check
On Mon, 31 Oct 2016, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF.
Title : Managing DS records from parent via CDS/CDNSKEY
Autho
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF.
Title : Managing DS records from parent via CDS/CDNSKEY
Authors : Olafur Gudmundsson
Greetings. As y'all can see from the diff, we added most of the things
that the WG proposed, but not much else. This is due mostly to a failure
on the authors' part, not on the WG's part. We still have a list of
things we want to do, but didn't get to in the past few months. We
apologize, and w
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF.
Title : DNS Terminology
Authors : Paul Hoffman
Andrew Sullivan
12 matches
Mail list logo
