Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-05

2016-10-09 Thread Federico Santandrea
Il 9 ottobre 2016 19:36:34 CEST, John Levine ha scritto: >There is absolutely no standardization or commonality in the protocol >switches that people use for non-DNS names. For .local it's in >library routines like gethostbyname() that map names to IP addresses, >for .onion it's in a SOCKS proxy

Re: [DNSOP] review of draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-05

2016-10-09 Thread Mark Andrews
In message , Matthew Pounsett writes: > > My first impression of this document is that it is still in need of some > extreme editing – mostly for grammar and syntax, but also for clarity and > readability. I've included many of the early problems I found in a list > of nits at the end of this

Re: [DNSOP] Comments on draft-ietf-dnsop-alt-tld-05

2016-10-09 Thread John Levine
>1) applications may query for "alt." for some RR. If the >resolver is not "alt-tld aware", or alt-tld functionality >has been disabled, then the request will return NXDOMAIN; >if instead the mechanism is supported, it would return >NOERROR with an empty answer. Note that this is b

Re: [DNSOP] Mandated order of CNAME records in a CNAME chain?

2016-10-09 Thread Florian Weimer
* Mark Andrews: > In message <87bmz3p4lt@mid.deneb.enyo.de>, Florian Weimer writes: >> * Robert Edmonds: >> >> > I think there was already a thread on this topic recently on this list >> > ("Order of CNAME and A in Authoritative Reply" from August 2015). There >> > was some discussion over "ad